Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fastmake

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:29, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fastmake

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Unable to find any reliable sources that cover it in-depth. CNMall41 (talk) 07:08, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 11:12, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as currently questionably notable and improvable with nothing else to suggest a better solidly notable article. SwisterTwister talk 05:54, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up download sites, but no significant WP:RS coverage of this software.Dialectric (talk) 14:46, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.