Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fast and Curious

Fast and Curious

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NALBUM. The album has no significant coverage, award wins/nominations, music chart history. The same goes for the songs on the album. The page's references rely on music store links (Bandcamp, iTunes, BigCartel). Other "sources" include expired links and YouTube links. There are no further sources that can be gathered to support any album sale claims, recording dates, etc. Sackkid (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 02:29, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Sy_Smith#2011–2015:_Fast_and_Curious ApexParagon (talk) 03:08, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note I think it is worth nominating the artist page for deletion too. While she has an Emmy nomination, it doesn't strengthen the article and frankly she doesn't much media coverage outside of blogs. There is a Billboard charting song but again, the page is a weak keep at best. So I am open to nominating that page for deletion as well. Sackkid (talk) 03:43, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:15, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Sy Smith#2011–2015: Fast and Curious per nom. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 15:28, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Just a comment in case you don't have the script installed so you can see the font is in pink, but Sy Smith is nominated for an AFD discussion. So, it might not be the best target article. Or, if you believe it should be, you might consider participating in that AFD, too to ensure it is not deleted. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:17, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per above. At present the Sy Smith AfD discussion does appear to be tending towards WP:SNOW keep. ResonantDis_tortion 08:39, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Sy Smith#2011–2015: Fast and Curious: Album not notable on it's own. No SIGCOV. No awards or national charting. Almost no reviews, and most are user generated or not independent. — Itzcuauhtli11 (talk) 14:40, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]