Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fast Simplex Link

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was merge to MicroBlaze. (non-admin closure) Left guide (talk) 02:55, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fast Simplex Link

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced stub failing WP:GNG. There are seemingly many sources, but they're all just the same primary sources, namely documentation for MicroBlaze. Would blank and redirect to MicroBlaze, but that article doesn't even mention this. JustARandomSquid (talk) 18:40, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Computing. JustARandomSquid (talk) 18:40, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep~~: I added some secondary sources. There is room for further improvement. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 02:37, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Pretty good job, actually. Personally, I'd still probably lean to something like a redirect to Microblaze, but I'll let other editors decide on whether notability has been established. JustARandomSquid (talk) 05:49, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,

Salvio giuliano

18:49, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just noting that I am not opposed to merging to MicroBlaze per WP:NOPAGE, but the material should be preserved. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 05:13, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Delete, Merge, Keep, we need to hear from more participants here or it will be a No consensus closure.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:03, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm changing my vote to

Redirect

to

MicroBlaze

. While Helpful Raccoon's sources are great work, none of them deal primarily with the Fast Simplex Whatever, which seems to be a minor aspect of Microblaze, so minor, in fact, that the main page doesn't mention it. I would like to see it do so and vote merge, but we'd need someone with specialist knowledge to do this, and that specialist might as well do a major revision of the MicroBlaze article. If someone can be found to do that, they will include information on our little Simplex guy if it's notable enough for inclusion.

JustARandomSquid (talk) 20:05, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am fine with merging if there are no other !votes. Specialist knowledge isn't needed to merge, this page can just be copied into a new section in the MicroBlaze article. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 02:50, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The more I think about this, the more I'm convinced that merge is the best outcome per above. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 08:32, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect think this article is to narrow to deserve its own page. Redirecting to the page about "microblaze" processors is a good outcome as this article could be easily included as a paragraph there. Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 01:30, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.