Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fasihuddin qureshi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted as a copyright violation. ~ Riana ⁂ 01:06, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fasihuddin qureshi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My knowledge of contemporary Pakistani painters is non-existent, but I don't see much in the way of notability. If the article is worth keeping, the copyvio of his website needs to be dealt with. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:38, 26 October 2009 (UTC) Clarityfiend (talk) 08:38, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:02, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 02:55, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. – Eastmain (talk) 02:55, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This could have been speedy deleted as it doesn't assert notability and it as well, it may be a copyvio. freshacconci talktalk 03:02, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Fresh. Johnbod (talk) 04:57, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above...Modernist (talk) 23:59, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete: I tagged this as a copyvio. Joe Chill (talk) 00:00, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.