Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fake ABC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wifione ^Message 11:23, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fake ABC

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While this does appear to be a phrase used in popular culture I think it falls into the WP:NEO category. ParacusForward (talk) 07:06, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 08:18, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 08:18, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Personal essay advocating a non-notable neologism. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:34, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 01:27, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as an unsourced original essay about a neologism. Actually sort of interesting, but Wikipedia is not the place for OR. Carrite (talk) 08:18, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.