Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fabric.js
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Fabric.js (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Only primary sources used in the article. A WP:BEFORE search failed to yield any suitable sources. Madeleine (talk) 02:40, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 02:49, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- What about this? I also found mention of it in a number of books on HTML5 with Google Books and Internet Archive. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 03:00, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- I've found multiple passing mentions of it but I haven't found any that demonstrate significant coverage. I'm unable to look at the source you linked due to a paywall, sadly. Madeleine (talk) 03:15, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: There are some papers on GScholar with more coverage than passing mentions, but I don't consider any of them to be usable. I'm able to view this source and it only contains superficial discussion of Fabric.js: two sentences comparing basic features and a short table comparing syntax. There's also this journal article, which I don't consider to be a reliable source based on the low quality of the paper (what reputable journal would publish an extremely simple app prototype as novel research?) Other journal articles I found have similar reliability problems.