Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FXhome EffectsLab

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Close and rename. (non-admin closure) NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 10:05, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FXhome EffectsLab

This article may have notable and verifiable content, but I don't think the content is notable enough for its own article. What do you think?. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 15:21, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep because it has been the subject of independent reviews e.g. [1] and [2], so meets Wikipedia:Notability. Jll (talk) 17:57, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:32, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 03:24, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

~~Very weak~~ keep. Seems to barely reach the notability standard with only one serious review in PC Advisor; the second review is from a site where anyone can add a review. VG ☎ 08:26, 14 October 2008 (UTC) (more sources found) VG ☎ 06:48, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have now found reviews at PC Pro [3], Maximum PC [4], Microfilmmaker Magazine [5], Creative Mac [6]. Otest.co.uk, a site I had not come across before, says at [7] that it was reviewed in MacWorld and a magazine called Windows XP Made Easy. If you are searching for other online reviews, be warned that the PC Pro review seems to also surface as Computer Buyer and Computer Shopper; I think that these three titles are all owned by the same parent company. Jll (talk) 18:29, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another comment Incidently they all call the product EffectsLab Pro rather than EffectsLab, as does the "official site" link in the article itself so if it does survive this AfD then it needs moving. Jll (talk) 18:29, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good job. Please add the references to the article as well. VG ☎ 06:48, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and rename to EffectsLab Pro per Jll. -- Banjeboi 17:06, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.