Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FIIOB

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 22:38, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

FIIOB

FIIOB (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet general notable guidelines or WP:WEB CutOffTies (talk) 07:57, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

• Keep

This should must be kept as of what are my views as this page is about a organization that's even registered under Non-profit org. section of Indian Societies act. So my only request is that, that there are more than a 100,000 people who know about this organization in India and support it too. So this page must be included in here for being quite a famous and money spending organization. There have been several articles published in newspapers about this organization too

No one can now disagree the fact that this has no such significance or its not verified from trusted sources. Realmmb^Con.Talk 08:59, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

References

• Keep but merge these two articles - there is no reason for the FIIOB FC to be a separate article. —Мандичка^YO 😜 12:39, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
• Delete - one article and a facebook page do not suffice to show notability of a college club.--Rpclod (talk) 15:42, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
• Delete Independent attention needs to be paid to it to establish notability, and there's no indication of any such thing. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:23, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:16, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

• Weak keep - sources noted above indicate a reasonably significant level of coverage in reliable sources. Article needs expanding to include content from these rather than relying on primary sources. Fenix down (talk) 07:38, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

• Delete - Looking at things now I have a bit more time on my hands, those are basically the only sources that I can find that discuss the activities of the organisation in detail. there looked like there were a number of other items, articles such as this and this only mention the organisation tangentially. Fenix down (talk) 07:23, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

• Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 11:35, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:04, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mr. Guye (talk) 21:02, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

• Delete: Kinda wondering why this was relisted, seeing as only one Keep voter proffered a policy-based reason to keep. As far as the sources Realmmb put up, they aren't about the subject, which is only briefly mentioned in both. No sign this passes the GNG. Nha Trang ^Allons! 11:29, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
• Note Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FIIOB F.T was closed as Merge to this article, so if this article (FIIOB) gets deleted, I belive FIIOB F.T should as well. Sorry, should have probably put them up for AFD together. --CutOffTies (talk) 02:58, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.