Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/F-16 flight simulator

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton ^Happy ^Holidays 01:10, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

F-16 flight simulator

Fails to establish a claim of notability, and also to verify this through reliable independent sources. The limited references provided include a press release, and other non-independent sources. The article is also incoherent, and I do not see this as a natural grouping for a subject. Of much more applicability would be an article on military PC-based Desk Top Trainers not just specifying one aircraft type. There is no rational as to why F-16 PC Based desk top trainers are more relevant compared to, say, an F/A-18 PC Desk top trainer. The article cannot be salvaged in such a way that it makes sense, as well as satisfying notability. Icemotoboy (talk) 22:13, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. Icemotoboy (talk) 22:16, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Icemotoboy (talk) 22:21, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. —Nick-D (talk) 09:51, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Your nom confused me a bit, but now I've read the article I get it; this is simply just a list of flight simulator games that feature F-16s. Ryan4314 (talk) 09:59, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, was a little on the confusing side, wasn't it! Icemotoboy (talk) 20:47, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - None notable collection of video games and devices. MilborneOne (talk) 12:11, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I think there is scope for a article about F-16 flight simulators (and video games - why, we could start with "F-16 Fighting Falcon" [1989, CodeMasters] !), but this has inherent WP:V and WP:OR problems. Marasmusine (talk) 15:59, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.