Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Extreme Secure Layer
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 13:58, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Extreme Secure Layer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
overly promotional and no indication this software is remotely notable, sources given do not actually mention the software Jac16888 Talk 15:35, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I could not find any independent sources discussing this topic in particular; the references in the article are mostly about cookies in general. It seems to fail general notability guidelines. The article itself is relentlessly promotional. --Mark viking (talk) 16:01, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - references provided are insufficient to establish notability of this software; created by an SPA as likely promotional. Dialectric (talk) 02:46, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Google searches give a lot primary sources, and not much else. The article itself doesn't make a good case for asserting notability. — daranz [ t ] 19:43, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: A related AFD is going at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suleman Malik - the apparent creator of this technology. Both articles are authored by the same single-purpose account (definitely WP:AUTOBIO). So far the consensus is to salt it, because it's very non-notable and is repeatedly posted to Wikipedia. Alan(E) 05:30, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Poor sources. Non-notable. Alan(E) 05:30, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.