Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/External reference

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftify. Mz7 (talk) 04:12, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

External reference

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSOFTWARE. If the article is kept, it needs to be Drafted as not ready for mainspace. // Timothy :: talk 00:51, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 00:51, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify - It's not a neologism and the concept is clearly important. But this should not have been created in mainspace and it would not have graduated in its present form via the AfC process. — Charles Stewart (talk) 08:23, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nom Comment: I almost drafted this, no objection. I also thought about merge targets and would not object if one is found that makes sense and improves the target and the content. // Timothy :: talk 08:58, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.