Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exchange 2.0

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete. (CSD G11) As DGG says, there may be an article to write on this topic, but this isn't it. It is unadulterated promotion. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:28, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Exchange 2.0

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Virtusl exchange might be a good topic for an article. This article,is however a promotion for one particualr initiative, and consists almost entirel y of general background and a list of who spoke at their various events, which is trivial coverage. As would be expected for such content, written by a paid promotional editor. This indicates a common problem with such editing: instead of a decent article that a NPOV editor would write on something good and interesting, we have this relatively useless propaganda. DGG ( talk ) 17:58, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:07, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:07, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, | Uncle Milty | talk | 12:28, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.