Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Example of proverb
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect. Redirected to Proverb by Sulaimandaud. (non-admin closure) Jim Carter (from public cyber) 08:07, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- Example of proverb (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There is a detailed article on proverb Sulaimandaud (talk) 07:36, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
- Early close and redirect to Proverb. Obvious result is obvious; we do not need to wait a week for this. @Sulaimandaud: remember that redirects can be done boldly without XfD. VQuakr (talk) 07:44, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as a duplicate of Proverb; I don't think the title is particularly useful as a redirect. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 08:31, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:55, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per A10 - I'm also not convinced that the title is a likely search term. Ansh666 21:11, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
- Old Wikipedia proverb: Article without indefinite article should be deleted as unlikely search option. Not speedily as it's not a duplication, merely a crappy list. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:22, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.