Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Everify

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to E-Verify. (non-admin closure) BusterD (talk) 23:57, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Everify

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article lacks reliable third party sources and appears to fail the notability guidelines for companies. Alpha Quadrant ^talk 23:54, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Poorly written and the article doesn't indicate eVerify's notability, but it's a requirement imposed on US employers by the US government to use eVerify to validate prospective employees' right to work in the US. See [1]. I can see, though, why the deletion process was begun, based upon the article as it is now written. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 00:03, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Revert to Redirect to E-Verify. This article is not about the US government service. It is spam for a background check service. The redirect was replaced with this article and should be reverted. -- Whpq (talk) 13:26, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to E-Verify. That's what I created the page for in 2008 and it could have been reverted since the page was created by an anonymous editor and seems to meet Advertising CSD. If reverting becomes a problem then a semi-protect might be necessary at some point. gren グレン 06:12, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 17:03, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 17:03, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to E-Verify per Gren and Whpq, and keep an eye on the page to make sure it doesn't get spammed again. --MelanieN (talk) 21:10, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Revert to Redirect to E-Verify --Ryan.germany (talk) 14:51, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.