Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eva Kuwailanimamao Cartwright

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:40, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Eva Kuwailanimamao Cartwright

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per a suggestion in a successful Afd (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daisy Napulahaokalani Cartwright), I am nominating various other relatives who are equally unnotable. This isn't ancestry.com. Clarityfiend (talk) 04:25, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support deletion of all - Pretty sure it wasn't the intent of Kavebear to use Wikipedia as if it were a genealogy site, but simply create articles for all of the relatives of the royal family....but then not all of them are notable enough for mention in an entire article. References are seriously weak...so delete.--Mark Miller (talk) 05:55, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages because none of their articles show any indication of notability:

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hawaii-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:23, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:23, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:32, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - non-notable aside from who she is related to. The inclusionist in me hates seeing articles on historic figures removed, but I'm just not seeing notability of any sort here. 78.26 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 18:06, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.