Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EtutorWorld
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 07:54, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- EtutorWorld (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No notability - fails WP:N and no assertion of notability. No independent verifiable sources Velella Velella Talk 19:15, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per WP:CORP. Guoguo12--Talk-- 19:50, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:59, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:59, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - The one working source given does appear to be reliable. Questionable whether one source meets WP:CORP significance criterion. I've put up a notability banner in effort to answer that. No need to jump straight to AfD here. --Kvng (talk) 15:10, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:29, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Far to adverty for me, one functional link of questionable validity and little on the Google search. My belief is that it cannot be rewritten to the point of functionality with the currently available sources. Sven Manguard Talk 04:30, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.