Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Wordekemper (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 01:58, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Wordekemper

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable former minor league baseball player who fails WP:BASE/N and WP:GNG. References are WP:ROUTINE. His time in the CPBL no longer qualifies him as passing WP:BASE/N. Alex (talk) 21:06, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 22:02, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 22:02, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 22:02, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. Alex (talk) 09:31, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I said in the last discussion on him that the coverage was of the WP:ROUTINE variety, making him WP:Run-of-the-mill. Doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:BASE/N. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:50, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; I created this before I had any knowledge of any notability policies and I agree that he doesn't meet notability guidelines. StringTheory11 (t • c) 17:07, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions. Alex (talk) 00:55, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nebraska-related deletion discussions. Alex (talk) 00:55, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Alex (talk) 00:55, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.