Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Envers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:32, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Envers

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and has been clearly written as a WP:PROMO breaching the WP:NPOV. Abishe (talk) 03:15, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 03:15, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 03:15, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 03:15, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Latvia-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 03:15, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Created as a redirect and then 5 days later replaced by the same editor with a fully-formed article about a company. The listed awards, from partner firms and a "CSS design awards" with no intrinsic notability, are classed as Trivial Coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH. The article describes a company going about its business, and I am not finding evidence of attained notability. AllyD (talk) 15:27, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this paid-for spam. I've blocked 7 or so editors today having the same editing pattern for UPE, the author is one of them. MER-C 17:59, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:GNG. KartikeyaS (talk) 19:07, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, fails GNG/WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 16:30, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.