Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily Addison

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:53, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Emily Addison

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Puff piece for bondage model created by SPA. Fails current, disfavored version of PORNBIO as well as the GNG. Common name, but all pertinent GNews hits appear to be press releases. No reliably sourced biographical content. All references are promo pages. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 17:00, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Same concerns as OP really. Non-notable. No awards. Etc. Wouldn't pass WP:GNG or any other standards. Dismas|^(talk) 17:29, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: PORNBIO was amended yesterday so I'm not sure how it applies considering her award. I have not had a chance to review the category of the award. Morbidthoughts (talk) 18:24, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

She wasn't even in the video involved and can't possibly have won or been nominated for the award. I don't know if the SPA-article creator is merely inept, grossly confused, or trying to put something over. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 19:24, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete then. BLP warnings are appropriate in addition to the removal of any unverified claim. Morbidthoughts (talk) 00:13, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails GNG without RS coverage. Fails PORNBIO both old and current. One AVN nomination claim fails verification. The other AVN "win" was for the film (best release), not her. • Gene93k (talk) 19:28, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails GNG. Hipocrite (talk) 13:51, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.