Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embedded System Debug Plug-in for Eclipse

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:11, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Embedded System Debug Plug-in for Eclipse

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Some random Eclipse (software) plug-in, or maybe a class/category of related plug-ins. World is full of plug-ins to software systems, I cannot see what makes this notable. Reference section contains only irrelevant links so this currently has zero reliable sources. External links are dead. All usable text (about embedded debugging in general, JTAG, etc.) is already in proper articles. Article has not been improved since early 2012. jni (talk) 09:14, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:10, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:11, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not clear at all what the article is about, as per nom. The Capital Letters in the Title might suggest a particular product is being described, which would not meet notability guidelines. The text goes back and forth using different capitalizations and singular and plural, so maybe was intended to talk about the general process, but Wikipedia is not a HOWTO guide. The whole idea of Eclipse is that there are all sorts of "plugins" so nothing notable in one kind of them. W Nowicki (talk) 16:41, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No indication of why this Eclipse plugin is notable. Google searches seem to mostly return this article and non-RS junk. — daranz [ t ] 23:28, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.