Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elveno Pastorelli

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MBisanz ^talk 01:59, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Elveno Pastorelli

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of meeting notability for persons. At best known for one event, which is not sufficient. Slywriter (talk) 21:45, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:03, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:03, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No RS establishing notability here for this person. Deathlibrarian (talk) 03:30, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep He was a prefect and the first general manager of a not-yet-officially-established Protezione Civile, appointed by president Pertini. Of course he's mainly known for his involvement in the Vermicino tragedy, but also for leading the rescue and reconstruction operations after the 1980 Irpinia earthquake. He is a prominent figure in the history of emergency services and civil defense in Italy, since he contribued significantly to their establishment (see this book by Walter Veltroni, or this history book published by Editori Laterza). Lots of other reliable sources can be easily found online [1]--Alienautic (talk) 23:10, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There are enough sources in the Italian page - that can be utilized in the @en page - to achieve notability. I have started copying over relevant sources, and fixing the citation formatting. Lamona (talk) 19:48, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I added references but there is more behind firewalls, e.g. Corriere della Sera, that I can't get to. I'm not 100% sure that this has taken the page up to notability, but it's getting there. Lamona (talk) 16:33, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 06:00, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:47, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per improvements by Lamona. RoseCherry64 (talk) 16:33, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, besides the already highlined sources there is plenty of additional coverage in la Repubblica archives, such as [2] and [3]. Cavarrone 19:52, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.