Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elmwood Productions
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 23:30, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Elmwood Productions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Vanity article about an obscure film production company that has yet to create any films that meet Wikipedia's definition of notability. Does not pass WP:CORP. Warrah (talk) 16:00, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I can't find any reliable sources that indicate this company is notable per WP:CORP. Most of the Google hits are blogs, WP, the official site, and social networking sites. The article was created by User:ElmwoodJon, who also removed COI and unref tags without appropriately dealing with those issues. PDCook (talk) 19:35, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Delete without prejudice as not yet notable. If or when this group receives coverage that shows notability, its return might be considered. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 17:25, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I cannot find significant coverage in reliable sources of the company. Jujutacular T · C 18:32, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.