Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Rodgers
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to List of Law & Order: Criminal Intent characters. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 21:03, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Elizabeth Rodgers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete - no sources indicate that this fictional character is independently notable. Fails WP:GNG and WP:PLOT. Nothing is sourced and there's no obvious redirect target, so merger and redirect is not appropriate. Otto4711 (talk) 18:17, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:44, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:44, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to List of Law & Order: Criminal Intent characters. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 19:51, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per Neutralhomer. Note that the nom is incorrect: the article is sourced to primary sources, which meet V (but not N) and hence an excellent candidate for a merger. Name is a plausible search term, so even failing a merge, a redirect to the character list entry is entirely appropriate. Jclemens (talk) 20:19, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per Neutralhomer as a compromise. Article only consists of primary sources which is not enough to WP:verify notability and makes this bad for a stand alone article. Shooterwalker (talk) 16:28, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.