Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Element14 Community

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If somebody wants to recreate the redirect on their own, I won't stop you, but the consensus here is to delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:24, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Element14 Community

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Doesn't meet WP:GNG. No significant coverage from independent reliable sources. Previously redirected to Element14, but the redirect was reverted by an IP editor. — Newslinger talk 13:58, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. — Newslinger talk 14:02, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — Newslinger talk 14:02, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. not notable, and highly promotional. DGG ( talk ) 18:23, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Promotional, and searches suggest that significant coverage in independent, reliable sources sufficient to meet the notability guideline for web-specific content are not found. Sam Sailor 05:39, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.