Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electro Interstitial Scan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:06, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Electro Interstitial Scan

Product placement, possible copyvio, and OR. Headbomb {^ταλκ_{κοντριβς} – WP Physics} 02:56, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm... article in its current state is not doing anyone any good. There is quite a bit of chatter online about it, so it may be notable, but unfortunately the notability might come from not doing what it claims (something not noted by the entry). See, for example, Electro Interstitial Scans: Another Test to Avoid. Hairhorn (talk) 03:06, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 03:23, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Week Keep or Merge : ROFL, this is funny. The one credible citation to IEEE probably just discusses an electrode in a salt solution, relevance to product would be tenuous at best. A section on questionable devices that generated rebuttals from credible sources may consider including this. Clearly as written it is a how to use guide on an unproven device. Nerdseeksblonde (talk) 13:02, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete reads like an advertisement or product website, cites Wikipedia extensively; even if it is a notable topic, it needs to be totally rewritten from scratch. By the way, the article had severe overuse of non-free images, none of which had fair-use rationales or any description of why they were necessary; I went ahead and BOLDly deleted them all. The uploader doesn't appear to have any understanding of our image policy, so I didn't see a need to wait around for improvements. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 14:25, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - already deleted a few months ago at AFD. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electro Interstitial Scanner. Zetawoof_(ζ) 21:31, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- It looks like the article's not quite written exactly the same, so we can wait out the AfD (not that it matters, this is obviously going to get deleted anyway). Incidentally, I should point out that MBisanz apparently forgot to delete all the orphaned non-free images when deleting the article (there are CC tags on them, but that's obviously a lie, and there's no source information), so I'll go in and delete them now. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 22:58, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.