Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eduardo Mathew

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 01:10, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eduardo Mathew

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Activist who -- well, has a story. I can't find much for references, and practically all of the external links are dead, including the official support site for the subject. I can't find references when searching the linked court sites, which seems a bit surprising. Strong bias in the existing article, particularly lacking references. Mikeblas (talk) 01:45, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:07, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:07, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:07, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:07, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:47, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The fact that all of the article's few references are all dead links suggests that it its subject is far from notable. BenLinus 1214^talk 01:53, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Insufficient coverage from reliable sources for notability. Refs leave article unverifiable. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 23:47, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.