Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Econodynamics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:10, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Econodynamics

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is little to indicate that this is a notable subject. The article overwhelmingly relies on a book by one scholar. The book has 50 or so citations on Google Scholar and doesn't appear to have any sustained academic coverage. Thenightaway (talk) 23:01, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and per my comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technological theory of social production, which seems to be about essentially the same topic. No indication that this is a notable theory. MCE89 (talk) 03:10, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Economics and Mathematics. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:54, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Editor,

Thank you for your reading and analyzing my contribution ‘Econodynamics’ and ‘Technological theory of social production’.

I agree with comments of the Reviewers.

I think the article ‘Technological theory of social production’ should be deleted, because it is too technical and could not be improved, without removing the technical details. The better exposition of the essentially same topic gives the article ‘Econodynamics’ . Nevertheless, I think the article could be given more concise and suitable for Encyclopedia form to explain to the readers what can be the use of application of thermodynamics to the economy problems. I shall try to do this, if the editors keep the article ‘Econodynamics’ at Wikipedia.

Sincialy, The creator of the articles, Madliner 46.39.57.196 (talk) 13:50, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The word econodynamics has been thrown around since at least 1934 (it's not that hard to imagine independent coinages), but in the specific sense described here, it does not appear to be a notable topic. Stepwise Continuous Dysfunction (talk) 23:32, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.