Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EXFORK

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^{talk to me} 17:25, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

EXFORK

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced article about a defunct band that asserts no notability except for a claim to have worked once with a well known producer. That producer's website offers no indication this is true. [1] Addionne (talk) 22:59, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. - SudoGhost (talk) 02:40, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Even if we could verify that the band worked with the particular producer in question, that wouldn't establish notability. In any case, there isn't significant coverage about them to establish notability. An earlier version of the article includes some assertions of media coverage. It is unclear how reliable those sources really are. I was able to find the Shredding Paper review noted in the earlier version, and it turns out that what I thought was a snippet from a review is in fact the entire review. -- Whpq (talk) 17:41, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.