Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ET (programming language)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 01:08, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ET (programming language)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of any notability. Maintenance tags for notability and ref improve removed by author with no significant article improvement. No evidence of any notability at all. Fails WP:GNG by a very wide margin. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 21:57, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. ^Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 22:59, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. ^Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 22:59, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. ^Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 22:59, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not only does this appear to be non-notable, as far as I can tell it doesn't even exist yet. Look at the source code repo – https://github.com/ET-Lang/ET – it contains no actual implementation of the language, just some design documents and some examples. I think this is just someone's personal project, and they haven't even built it yet, and already they are trying to make a Wikipedia article on it. SJK (talk) 09:52, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Doesnt't look notable to me. Enterprisey (talk!) 18:55, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not notable. The article can be recreated once the project is completed, released, and successful enough to gain significant coverage in reliable sources. Newslinger (talk) 19:33, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.