Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ESurveysPro

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 18:12, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ESurveysPro

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Corporate spam, seemingly not backed up by any independent third-party references. - Biruitorul ^Talk 18:05, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence of notability. Only refs are blog-like sites or dowloand links. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 20:35, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:25, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per WP:CSD § A7: this "application" is a survey website, and I see no substantial difference from the rest of them. The references are specifically interesting, though. May be it's time to blacklist about.com? — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 01:46, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No notability. Supposed reviews seem mainly based on self-supplied publicity material, although one comment casts doubt on the integrity of these suppliers, which would be another reason for not allowing inclusion. Melcombe (talk) 16:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.