Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ESpew
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:19, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- ESpew (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not satisfy WP:GNG. Trying to find any information about this website at all doesn't produce many, if any, results. Most references to eSpew are Wikipedia mirrors. SEMMENDINGER (talk) 19:36, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:38, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Already PROD'd, not elgible for Soft Deletion. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:07, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - I find absolutely nothing. If it ever did exist as a search engine, there is no evidence now. — Maile (talk) 01:30, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - lacks references to support. - Indefensible (talk) 03:23, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. I can verify that it existed, but that's about it. Jacona (talk) 01:15, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.