Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ERACENT

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 14:48, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ERACENT

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD on a business article. Unref'ed since creation in 2008. COI issues, creator appears to be a major subject. Fails WP:MILL Andy Dingley (talk) 23:50, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:48, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AfD notice has since been deleted (and now restored) by an involved editor. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:08, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Yet another company specializing in IT management software which allows organizations to manage IT assets. The non-neutral prose has an uniquely emetic quality: As Eracent's core competence is in the area of large scale IT asset management technology, the company provides products that interface and interoperate with other network solutions.... claims a unique native ability to maintain an accuracy rate of over 98%.... the first company to develop an automated License and Entitlements Management Process and continues to maintain the development lead in this category. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:54, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - A google new search finds an astounding number of press releases, and those that aren't are press release rehashes. -- Whpq (talk) 13:21, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.