Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EM Client (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:00, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

EM Client

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contains little if any encyclopedic content. Seems to Fail Wikipedia's General notability guideline. Article seems to be mostly original research WP:OR. FockeWulf FW 190 (talk) 17:25, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 17:27, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 17:27, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 17:27, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep NPASR No reason is given for revisiting this topic. Unscintillating (talk) 17:49, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- the same discussion as Courier (email client) and Libremail. Rhadow (talk) 01:09, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Previous AfD was 4 years ago, so renomination is not an issue. There are many sources (of variable quality) listed in the previous AfD, I will review these later. Pavlor (talk) 05:51, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep After review of the sources. Em Client seems to be of the Czech origin, which explains plenty of Czech sources about this application. Now sources:

[1] Mid-size PCWorld review (2012)
[2] Mid-size heise.de news article, there is also review in ct magazine (among other such applications; 17/2014), but behind pay-wall, so I can´t verify extent of that coverage.

Several zive.cz articles:

[3] - about start of development (2008)
[4] - Mid-size news (2010), mentions review in Computer 2/09 magazine
[5] - solid looking article about features (2011)

Two news items on chip.cz (personal and corporate edition): [6], [7] (2017) Pavlor (talk) 16:06, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.