Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dynamic awareness theory

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 01:13, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dynamic awareness theory

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This appears to be original research. The references in the article seem to be either primary research papers or not directly related to the subject, and I couldn't find any likely looking papers online. I don't think this theory has received enough notice in secondary sources to pass the general notability guideline. — Mr. Stradivarius on tour ^{♪ talk ♪} 02:16, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. — Mr. Stradivarius on tour ^{♪ talk ♪} 02:20, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. — Mr. Stradivarius on tour ^{♪ talk ♪} 02:21, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. From the article's lead: "The status of this theory is uncertain, as it has not yet been published in an established journal." Cnilep (talk) 03:11, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:CRYSTAL, we need to wait until it gets highly cited.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:28, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this theory is not notable currently.--Staberinde (talk) 20:04, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. a13ean (talk) 20:25, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.