Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Down the Block There's a Riot

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2010 November 21.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Merge, if needed, can be discussed at the article talk page. Fram (talk) 11:32, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Down the Block There's a Riot

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This title fails to meet the criteria of WP:ORG. AdamDeanHall (talk) 21:49, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep. The nomination is for an invalid reason. This is a television episode, not an organization, so it shouldn't be expected to meet the criteria of WP:ORG. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 21:48, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep. Why should this be deleted when all the other Desperate Housewives episodes have their own page? BurienBomber (talk) 22:07, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nominator has ownership issues when it comes to Desperate Housewives articles and this is an abuse of the AfD process in order to get their way with what they forsee is either an incorrect episode title or an article they didn't get to create. Episode title is sourced here. Nate • (chatter) 23:13, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 23:23, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 03:14, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Desperate Housewives (season 7) until at the very least there is a plot summary, despite flawed nom rationale...clearly just a title and date in no way meets WP:GNG and it doesn't air for a month. CTJF83 chat 03:17, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep not much point in deleting this only to re-create it in a month. (and it has to be said: WP:ORG for a TV episode??) Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:57, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep It will be re-created and notable in 4 weeks. Duplication of effort at that scale is wasteful and inefficient. Leave well alone. scope_creep (talk) 00:43, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep --NOTE: I have tried to add referenced content to the article, but the user who filed this AfD has been deleting the references and content BurienBomber (talk) 17:10, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.