Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doug Lloyd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) Cinder painter (talk) 21:51, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Doug Lloyd

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

From the references in the article, this player was drafted and traded. Played one game as a running back, but never touched the ball -- no attempts, no carries, no stats. Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT, since trivial coverage does not support notability. mikeblas (talk) 18:41, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, American football, and Wisconsin. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:31, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Like pretty much every other modern NFL player ever, Lloyd meets GNG, see e.g. Daily Citizen (2) and The Forum. BeanieFan11 (talk) 19:37, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per BeanieFan11's findings. Sigcov exists and (to the best of my knowledge) players in the modern NFL are inherently notable. Jordano^5³ 00:01, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The sources provided by BeanieFan11 have the requisite WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:SPORTSCRIT as they each contain multiple sentences of in-depth coverage about the subject. The article could use better citations but WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP. Let'srun (talk) 00:56, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per BeanieFan11. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:46, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Per Beanie Fan History6042😊 (Contact me) 23:47, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Meets WP:GNG and WP:BASIC, per BeanieFan11. Ejgreen77 (talk) 11:28, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - meets GNG. Rlendog (talk) 13:54, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep subject looks notable and has enough news coverage as mentioned above.Mysecretgarden (talk) 18:38, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.