Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dors Feline

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:05, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dors Feline

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable nude model. Fails WP:BIO ttonyb (talk) 11:37, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — does not meet WP:BIO. Zhernovoi (talk) 11:46, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This is nothing more than a promotion for her website. Prsaucer1958 (talk) 13:50, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:45, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:45, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails to meet GNG, BIO etc; Nothing notable about her whatsoever. EuroPride (talk) 16:38, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:PORNSTAR. SnottyWong talk 17:26, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I made it, and I've spent the last few days trying to find the right sources to establish notability, but I can't. She's gaining popularity, so I'm certain sometime in the near future those sources will exist. However, as I'm burnt out on the attitudes and poor manners of most wikipedians, I won't be the one making it. --Leodmacleod (talk) 20:16, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.