Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dogsbody

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. asilvering (talk) 07:32, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dogsbody (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTDICT. This article contains only a definition, synonyms, and etymological information.

Deprodded by an IP without any stated reason.

--Janhrach (talk) 17:45, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't find a digital copy of the final reference but I would bet that what is found there is not sufficient to support this article. Lamona (talk) 00:48, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: there is a Wikipedia article about the author of source no. 2. Janhrach (talk) 15:09, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that's how I confirmed that this was a personal project, unpublished (or self-published, but web-only). The "Words" site says In early 2017, he ceased writing World Wide Words. I don't think we can consider it a reliable source. In particular, I note that he does not include sources for his analysis of dogsbody so we lack verification. Lamona (talk) 15:57, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.