Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Documentum

Documentum

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The entire article is written like one big advertisement. Taking a look at it, it's very obvious to see that it is either written by AI, or it is solely written as a marketing tool. The main product of the article is also non-notable. st4rry :3 (talk) 17:08, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 April 25. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:22, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. AnonymousScholar49 (talk) 18:27, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:45, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the article strangely survived a deletion attempt in 2008, although the article was pretty much an advertisement then, and still is today. This article may have survived deletion once, but shouldnt a second. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 19:23, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Agree with nom - clearly written for advertisement/promo - section are written like a marketing presentation - e.g "Future Vision" with source as a whitepaper linked to a non-working link! Asteramellus (talk) 00:20, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]