Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disrespectoids

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:36, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disrespectoids

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable commercial content Alles Klar, Herr Kommisar 02:06, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:48, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:48, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:05, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:GNG. The only source I found was a promotional article, probably generated from a press release or a paid advertorial. - Mr X 05:20, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Does not meet notability guidelines. No hits in Google Books, only one hit in Google News Archive, to a promotional site ([1]). Northamerica1000^(talk) 21:39, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Non-notable advertising campaign. –TC N7 JM 15:57, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.