Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DiscoRunner
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. North America1000 00:00, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
- DiscoRunner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not Notable. No sources. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 21:43, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:40, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete, WP:SPA orphan. –Be..anyone (talk) 02:56, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - A News search found some results but nothing that appears significant. Highbeam, thefreelibrary and Books found nothing. SwisterTwister talk 20:47, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as lacking in depth coverage. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:00, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - software article of unclear notability, lacking independent refs. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage.Dialectric (talk) 15:29, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.