Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital Highway
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete and redirect to Internet.--Kubigula (talk) 01:20, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Digital Highway (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
This was one of my cleanup projects a while ago. I hate to exacerbate systemic bias by deleting an article about an Indian periodical, but unfortunately, there are no references, and I wasn't able to find anything relevant on a search engine. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 03:49, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 12:54, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, unless some kind of sources can be provided. Appears to be simply non-notable. Terraxos (talk) 00:08, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment if deleted, it should redirect to Internet, as one of the more common monikers used for it. 132.205.44.5 (talk) 00:10, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Could you please specify why-redirect? I could not even find a single reliable source about this magazine.
--Avinesh Jose T 06:32, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]- They said, and i quote, "it should redirect to Internet, as one of the more common monikers used for it". -- Jimmi Hugh (talk) 14:55, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TigerShark (talk) 23:26, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree with the comments above me. I see no sources to indicate notability, and since Digital Highway might be used as another term for the internet, I agree that redirecting to Internet is appropriate. I see no particular reason to keep the article's history. seresin wasn't he just...? 00:03, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Still can't find any sources on this. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 05:25, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.