Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devils hill

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Snow consensus for delete. Topic currently lacks coverage to show notability. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:11, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Devils hill

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed prod - see article talk page. Fails WP:Notability and WP:Verifiability. I cannot find any references to this project apart from its website. Jll (talk) 21:20, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Unremarkable project. No references, no significant performers/artists involved. Pure speculation. MikeWazowski (talk) 21:25, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unnotable future film. If it receives the widespread attention required to ascertain notability, then a new article can be created, but at the moment it doesn't meet the threshold for films. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 21:35, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I couldn't find any reliable mention of the topic outside of WP. I note too that the article creator and one other user have not edited anything beyond these two articles. Claret Ash 00:16, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - After some searches, not finding coverage in reliable sources. Northamerica1000^(talk) 02:58, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 18:42, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:42, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per the above; I'm unable to find coverage in reliable sources for this project; does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:NFILM at this time. Gongshow ^Talk 08:18, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No third party coverage, kind of looks like a hastily slapped together ad to direct people to their website... Sergecross73 msg me 21:53, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It reads like an advert. The only detail given, really, is the location while everything else is abstract. What sort of movie? How does the game relate? What sort of game is it? SilentVendetta (talk) 03:57, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.