Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dethcentrik
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:43, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Dethcentrik (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about a non-notable band; sources are not notable or reputable, as these are probably created by the band in question (formerly at WP:AFC; user accepted it himself) —DuncanWhat I Do / What I Say 05:52, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Article more informative than many regarding bands in the genre, many bands in the genre have no recordings more reputable than this, and article should be proportional to the type of topic, therefore: WP:BAND is met in criteria 11 indefinitely, and meets criteria 7 as well. Will have other users I know help validate this.-User:MetallerMex666 —Preceding undated comment added 11:56, 29 July 2010 (UTC).[reply]
Viewing WP:BAND criteria 7 is undeniably met, 11 is really left to the intrepretation of "Major".—Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.221.98.82 (talk) 12:10, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:58, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete doesn't meet criteria 7, lacks verifiability. Doesn't meet 11, no evidence of any nation play shown. Huge list of non reliable sources does not make notable. I didn't find coverage in independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme (talk)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.