Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Designtechnica

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Digital Trends. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 01:49, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Designtechnica

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All news search results are from Digital Trends, which is related. Greek Legend (talk) 08:53, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:30, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:30, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:30, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:30, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:25, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Digital Trends. The website is notable, its company is not. SST flyer 02:37, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect at best as this seems best connected to that, not yet solidly independently notable. SwisterTwister talk 06:22, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.