Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Designbox
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:28, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Designbox (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable software; can't find any SIGCOV besides a few trivial mentions ([1], [2]). Deproded in 2010 without explanation. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 07:50, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products, Computing, and Software. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 07:50, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:09, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete, has been without sources since it was created and still nothing indicating its notability. Sources in the article are primary to the subject. Mekomo (talk) 13:39, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:14, 19 April 2025 (UTC)- Delete. Lacks significant, independent coverage. Looking back, it seems that there was a successful request for undeletion for this article in 2010, but there was no evidence of notability shown there, just unsourced claims that it is notable.[3] death pact (again) 17:19, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for the context around the PROD! Helpful Raccoon (talk) 20:49, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete. Lacks significant, independent coverage. Looking back, it seems that there was a successful request for undeletion for this article in 2010, but there was no evidence of notability shown there, just unsourced claims that it is notable.[3] death pact (again) 17:19, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.