Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dental LED lamp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Article's subject is found to not be notable. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:16, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dental LED lamp

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article, with its excessive inclusion of material about the physics of light and the biology of light perception, seems to be more an over-inflated effort to sell LED dental lamps than anything else. We don't have an article on plain vanilla dental lamps; it seems unlikely that we need this spammy feeling version on one particular kind of dental lamp. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:48, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's just a translated copy of the Italian Wiki page. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:01, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Be that as it may, I don't think it has any business here. I looked at the it.wiki version, and I don't think that belongs either. I'm also pretty sure all of the diagrams are copied from GCOMM's product literature about their version of the LED dental lamp, but that's all the problem of the people at it.wiki to sort out. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 22:06, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Promotional, excessive detail with a hint of WP:OR. The first few sections are just about Light/Optics, Visual perception and Colorimetry in general. And then the promotionalism kicks in like an infomercial. The actual concept of dental LED lamps might deserve a slight mention at Dental engine ("Dental engines are sometimes equipped with lamps."), but even that's a stretch. 野狼院ひさし u/t/c 01:27, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.