Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Del Thiessen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. A consensus to Keep and a poor deletion nomination with no evidence of BEFORE. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:46, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Del Thiessen

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notability Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 02:12, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Valorrr ^{(lets chat)} 03:08, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep. While the page has significant structural problems, a Fellow of American Psychological Association (see the orbit at the journal of the International Society for Comparative Psychology) passes WP:NPROF#C3 independent of whether his citations also pass C1 (Scopus h-factor 28). This was previously noted when the nominator's PROD was contested. No justification provided by nominator with the PROD, and nothing here beyond the statement "Lack of notability".

Comment the GScholar topic of comparative psychology is not a high citation area, so an h-factor of 28 might pass C1.

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Psychology, California, Colorado, and Texas. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:54, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Passes NPROF C3. nf utvol (talk) 12:05, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. He passes NPROF #1 and #3. --hroest 13:11, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. We have at least three reviews of his books Gene Organization and Behavior (Morris), The Evolution and Chemistry of Aggression (Eisenberg) (Sigg). The reviews would be only enough for a weak WP:AUTHOR keep for me but the obituary linked above and the case for WP:PROF#C1 through the fellowships push it up to a full keep. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:19, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as above. Xxanthippe (talk) 03:26, 7 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]
Keep for the reasons stated above. — Itzcuauhtli11 (talk) 15:02, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.