Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Debate over oral Torah
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 18:18, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Debate over oral Torah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article really should be either in the article on the Oral Law or parsed back into the articles on the parent sects/offshoots/streams of Judaism. The arguments of each group are different, and it is likely a gross oversimplification to lump them all together. Avi (talk) 07:27, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Strip down all the vague/poorly sourced content, keep whatever can be sourced to high-quality secondary sources and then merge with Oral Torah. JFW | T@lk 09:14, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:23, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - nothing of value to merge. -- Y not? 03:34, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, because this article violates Wikipedia:Content forking multiple times since there is a comprehensive Oral Torah article already that deals with alternate views, including the ones repetitively reposted in this poorly-constructed article. This article is pointless and is just a shot at stirring up hatred of the Talmud by certain groups opposed to it for their own extreme POV reasons. IZAK (talk) 04:20, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - agree with the above comments. --Piz d'Es-Cha (talk) 15:08, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Strip WP:OR and merge with Oral Torah. Joe407 (talk) 12:59, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.