Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Lovelace

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 12:53, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

David Lovelace

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable animator. Imdb says he has only worked on 2 or 3 short films and appear to be a local cartoonist. No hits in google books or extensive coverage in reliable web sources. Aside from this the article appears to be a COI and the photograph of the individual was taken by the article writer. The reason for creating the article is purely promotional; the creator was "doing a friend a favour", the same friend who drew lurid cartoons for his product Metasonix which he is trying to promote, yet even the external link to his own website metasonix.com is a dead link. It tries to claim notability by for wining a gold award but cites sources simply as "Yankovic Heads 'Straight Outta Lynwood' ^ Flash Animation Gets Weird". Yankovic Heads 'Straight Outta Lynwood simply mentions the name, rather than extensive coverage about his work.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:33, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: fails WP:FILMMAKER and WP:SIGCOV. Thine Antique Pen 11:44, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There are few, if any, reliable secondary sources. Film and animation work doesn't seems to satisfy WP:FILMMAKER. CodeTheorist (talk) 12:52, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nothing original to say. As per Thine Antique Pen. Joyson Prabhu ^{Holla at me!} 13:41, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:03, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:03, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.